Care to elaborate on this "buggy and insecure" RPC thingy?
I thought the security problems with RPC were hotfixed ages ago.
Brian Steele
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus D�hr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 5:21 AM
> To: 'Brian Steele'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why not NT?
> Importance: High
[snip]
> there are many, many tools for remote administration of NT, but
> they all need
> the buggy and insecure RPC over named pipes (Port 135 up to 139)
> and I don't
> wanna enable these over the net for remote administration. Never
> ever do this...
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
