Thanks Joseph. I agree completely. That is precisely why I wanted something
more, and have yet to find it.



On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Joseph Brenner <joe.bren...@bluewin.ch>wrote:

>  Dear Roly, Dear Pedro,
>
> Thank you for taking this thread in a for me very interesting direction.
> As you know, interesting means what I find my logical system can confirm,
> improve, validate, etc. The two notes share one feature that one might
> criticize, namely, that they deal essentially with present, conscious
> material, whereas "information flow" almost  by defintion seems to involve
> components that are absent, potential, unconscious, etc.
>
> Similarly, the application of the Square of Opposition in Roly's reference
> would at first sight appear to be explanatory, but on closer inspection, I
> find everything reduced back to binary logic, arrows in a box. What has to
> be added, *pace *Jakobson, is some notion of the actual dynamics of what
> Roly calls "a mutual relateable framework". And let's not be too greedy:
> let's get the pairwise interactions right and then see where we can go with
> more complex ones.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joseph
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Roly Belfer <avi...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es>
> *Cc:* fis@listas.unizar.es
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:44 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Fis] social flow
>
> Dear Pedro
>
> Thank you! there is some sort of synchronicity here: I was just recently
> thinking about Roman Jakobson and his 6 levels of semiotic analysis.
> Especially the *phatic expression*, as some kind of white noise that is
> necessary for the interpersonal informational "handshake". That is, an
> infosphere - be it organic or more like artificial info networks - would
> need to have actants operate in a mutually relateable framework (even if it
> is only pairwise).
>
>  The meaningless/senseless datum is important for establishing the lines
> of communication, and perhaps some emergent properties (such as intimacy,
> grouping, pre-communicative  acceptance).
> Do you know of any quantified work re Jakobson? (I keep 
> this<http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/arquitectura/rlacruz/publicaciones_archivos/dimensions_english.pdf>around
>  for different purposes)
>
> Best
> Roly
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Pedro C. Marijuan <
> pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> wrote:
>
>> Dear FIS colleagues,
>>
>> Just a wandering thought, in part motivated by the highly formal
>> contents of the other discussion track. What are the major contents,
>> topics, and styles in our social, spontaneous exchanges? Seemingly the
>> response is that most of those exchanges are just casual, irrelevant,
>> performed for their own sake. There are scholarly references about
>> that---though our own perusal of social life may quite agree. The
>> information flow, the circulation of social information, becomes the
>> message itself (echoing McLuhan), amorphously gluing the different
>> networks of the social structure... Flowing naturally in spontaneous
>> exchanges and also fabricated and recirculated by the media. Our
>> talkative species needs the daily dose --otherwise mental health resents
>> quite easily.
>> I am these days reading Robert Trivers (2011) on self-deception and how
>> the info flow we are conscious of becomes a highly self-centered
>> concoction for for our own social self-promotion. I think it partially
>> dovetails with the above: "we are the content."
>>
>> best ---Pedro
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Pedro C. Marijuán
>> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>> Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
>> Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
>> Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
>> 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
>> Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
>> pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
>> http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fis mailing list
>> fis@listas.unizar.es
>> https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> fis mailing list
> fis@listas.unizar.es
> https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>
>
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to