Caro Pedro e Cari Tutti, di queste e di altre cose simili, alternative e concorrenti ho parlato in non pochi miei saggi e, naturalmente, continuerò a interessarmene. Qui mi limito ad elencare tre concetti molto presenti nella mia *Nuova economia*:
– nella «economia monetaria della produzione» di keynesiana memoria l’economia monetaria e l’economia «reale» vengono unificate da un’analisi che non può non essere resiliente: flessibile o liquida la prima, rigida o illiquida la seconda; – la legge fondamentale della scienza e dell’attività economica è proprio l’informazione, intesa come processo che dà forma o, al contrario, dis–informa; la mia ultima mail ribadisce, d'accordo con un grande fisico, che l'informazione è la legge basilare dell'esistenza e della conoscenza; – in *Dalla rivoluzione keynesiana alla nuova economia* ho esposto una teoria infor–monetaria che, forse, supera alcune considerazioni problematiche di Mariyuan. E per concludere questa breve interlocuzione, rivendico la primazia di avere affrontato il problema complesso dell’auto–organizzazione nel campo dell’economia capitalistica, in-cenrata sul processo di auto-valorizzazione del capitale di Karl Marx, per aver capito che bisognava buttare alle ortiche quella pseudo–teoria neoclassica che ha contribuito a provocare tanti guai nel mondo in cui viviamo. Ma chi ne è a conoscenza? Un abbraccio. Francesco Rizzo. 2015-12-02 21:30 GMT+01:00 John Prpic <john.pr...@ltu.se>: > Hi All, > > > I just ran across this new piece that I thought would be of interest to > both the current conversation, and the many others that have occurred here. > > > "The Bayesian Second Law of Thermodynamics" > > - http://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.02421v2.pdf > > > Best, > > John > > John Prpić > PhD Candidate > > Research <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1919614> > > Google Scholar > <https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=yiueCGUAAAAJ&hl=en> > Twitter <https://twitter.com/JPNuggets> > Special Issue > <https://beedie.sfu.ca/sms/admin/_DocLibrary/_ic/fd6699ff8c25b8f75e1f822da82412d7.pdf> > CHI 2016 Workshop <http://www.worklearn.org/> > ------------------------------ > *From:* Fis <fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es> on behalf of Pedro C. Marijuan > <pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 2, 2015 6:23 AM > *To:* 'fis' > *Cc:* Nikhil Joshi > *Subject:* Re: [Fis] Sustainability through multilevel research: > > Dear FIS colleages, > > Before assimilating the last exchanges (I have been on a trip), I have a > few pending comments on self-organization and monetary resilience. > > In some of the papers (links) Bob sent us, strong emphasis is put on > "self-organization of complex flow systems sharing common patterns of > behavior. Similar energy-flow concepts and analysis methods would apply to > economic systems as well as natural ones..." As the ongoing discussion > shows, that view can be more or less OK, but... The network and subsequent > IT analysis becomes appropriate for eco-systemic flows, but in my opinion > it obscures a fundamental trait of eco-nomic flows: that they are guided > and anticipated by a superimposed structure of information flows. So there > are two flows compounded, and each one is endowed with a specific fluency, > velocity, friction, etc. radically different. Handling prices of goods or > trading shares in a stock market is far away from circulating the physical > goods or from the physical and human structures of a company... > Unfortunately the info-structure of economy is not satisfactorily solved > yet (at least in my opinion), except the partial classical equilibrium > approaches and some diminishing returns and other nonlinear approaches. > Presumably, a more complete vision cannot be articulated yet. > > Anyhow, Lietaer's application (in the paper with Goerner and Ulanowicz) of > Bob's ecological criteria on resilience to the economic crisis looks > enormously interesting. Some of the thinking lines of Nikhil could > dovetail. The underlying problem is (at least in my opinion) how to give > voice to Nature, not only evaluating the value of human work done to > extract the raw matter or to collect it, but also the caring work with no > immediate return. Who may represent Nature herself and her interests in > the human monetary market? Analyzing the currency monopoly of our times, > and the present financial crisis, the main alternative seems to be > increasing the financial resilience by adding different types of > currencies. The Swiss B2B complementary currency is mentioned in the papers > (other local, regional, and sectorial cases also exist, and the Internet > may strongly facilitate such experiences). In this line, an ecologically > based currency or eco-coin ("ecos") could pick the voluntary work done by > individuals --not extracting for nature, but working for her preservation > and care. ONGs could certify the work properly done. Ecos could be a symbol > of voluntary work done and also a personal prestige and moral reward for > Nature "lovers". Quite many new people could be attracted to devote their > voluntary work to the direct stewardess of Nature (and not to > political-ideological green activism) being compensated by ecos. The > international clout of these ecos-coins could be considerable... and the > certification could be reasonably organized in a very ample scale. The > present consciousness and fear of climatic change would ad social urgency > and further potential importance... --Bob, could this "eco" idea may have > any sense? > > All the best--Pedro > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Pedro C. Marijuán > Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group > Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud > Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) > Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X > 50009 Zaragoza, Spain > Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& > 6818)pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fis mailing list > Fis@listas.unizar.es > http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis > >
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
