On Jan 22, 2008 8:41 PM, Philip Ganchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it help to read command names from the path for binaries first?
> There may still be man pages for commands that are not installed in
> the system when the completion files are generated. Maybe then when
> the user tries to complete this command, Fish should show the
> generated info and show mark the command as non-existent?
Hm. Having taken a closer look in response to Philip's question, it's
not a parsing problem at all. I was just testing that using a
one-character search term, which fish apparently explicitly excludes.
Is this exclusion really necessary? Even with ~4000 apropos results
and ~200 commands ('p' and 's' on my system, the largest by a wide
margin), there's no noticeable delay. Even on a 600 MHz machine,
there's only about a second's delay with these very long lists.
--
-Nick Pilon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
