The components themselves are great. They are lightweight, generally easy to skin, and the API is very compatible with the v2 components that MM ships.
With that said; the company that acquired the set, Metaliq, does not appear to be interested in documenting or supporting them. I have sent numerous emails/tickets trying to get better documentation, but have not received a reply yet on that issue. At one point, Grant Skinner said his people would try to get them to update the documentation, but this has not happened yet. Direct from their website you can see the last update was: September 1st, 2005 Version 1.0.124. HTH, Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Rodecker Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom? anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set from Metalliq? Just looking for some feedback...performance issues, comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc. _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com