The components themselves are great. They are lightweight, generally easy to
skin, and the API is very compatible with the v2 components that MM ships.

With that said; the company that acquired the set, Metaliq, does not appear
to be interested in documenting or supporting them. I have sent numerous
emails/tickets trying to get better documentation, but have not received a
reply yet on that issue. At one point, Grant Skinner said his people would
try to get them to update the documentation, but this has not happened yet.

Direct from their website you can see the last update was: September 1st,
2005 Version 1.0.124.

HTH,
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Rodecker
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:02 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] anyone using mCom?

anyone out there have any experience with using the mCom component set
from Metalliq?  Just looking for some feedback...performance issues,
comparison with v2, wierdness, extending, etc.
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com




_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to