yes.... did you think I didn't understand it was XML?  I meant I was
confused as to why it didn't have a namespace - I guess confused was not
the right word.  More like, surprised.

Jason Merrill
Bank of America  
GT&O Learning & Leadership Development
eTools & Multimedia Team


 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
>>Of Kenneth Kawamoto
>>Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 3:42 PM
>>To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
>>Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flash CS3 Announced
>>
>>>
>>> //Not so fast. :) What confused me in the demo is that XML did not 
>>> have MXML namespaces, so I wouldn't jump to that 
>>conclusion.  Seemed 
>>> to be straight old XML.
>>When you "Copy Motion as ActionScript 3.0..." it appears to 
>>be Flash CS3 converts timeline animation into an XML. Then 
>>you can perhaps apply this XML to any object on Stage using 
>>fl.motion.Animator Class? Also this means you can create 
>>complex animation using just XML. Very interesting...
>>
>>Kenneth Kawamoto
>>http://www.materiaprima.co.uk
>>_______________________________________________
>>Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
>>To change your subscription options or search the archive:
>>http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>>
>>Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
>>Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training 
>>http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
>>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to