good call Hans,
Agreed. This list may one of the most 'decent' i have ever seen and the
tone of the response scared me too.
We have all worried about our work being stolen by others - ridiculing
another for these same concerns violates the tone of 'our' group.
I also think the original poster handled the negative feedback in a very
sophisticated manner, hats off to you sir for being so tolerant.
sorry for the noise,
Dave_Matthews
http://www.2GoTo.com
------------------------------original---------
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:55:52 +0200
From: "Hans Wichman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: obfuscation swf !
Hi,
I might be wrong but like Bart said, I think SWFEncrypt does all this
already. At least I haven't had any problems with this andits fast too AND
usable from a build file. But I'm sure some of you will be able to crack it.
What I do have problems with is the attitude displayed towards Jimbo by some
of the responders for trying to come up with a nice and easy solution, even
it isn't foolproof. Putting a donkey sign over someones head is less than
motivating. He offered us a challenge, some of us took it and won. No need
to get all nasty about it imo.
greetz
JC
_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!Â
http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_hotmailtextlink2
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
