Joel, Another good optimization point, Joel. If we assume that Karim's custom cursor is already a child of the stage, then setChildIndex() should be more efficient. So I guess it depends on the implementation.
Interestingly, I get a RangeError with this: stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren); but this works: stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1); However, stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren); does not trigger the RangeError, and stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1); still produces the desired result. If this is a bug then 'stage.numChildren - 1' would be the safe way to go. Regards, -Keith http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Stransky > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:25 AM > To: Flash Coders List > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3 > > Very nice Keith. Wouldn't setChildIndex() work as well? Or is addChildAt() > better for ensuring that the cursor is added to the display list? > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Keith Reinfeld > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders