Hi Cor, Right. I know all that. The question is why doesn't stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren); trigger a RangeError?
Regards, -Keith http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cor > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:38 PM > To: 'Flash Coders List' > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3 > > It is not a bug. > The displayList stores it objects in a Array, wich starts at 0. > So Array["obj1","obj2","obj3","obj4"] has 4 children wich are located at > position 0, 1, 2, 3. > If you remove a child every other moves up 1 place. > > So stage.numChildren is accordingly out of range. > > HTH > C > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith > Reinfeld > Sent: vrijdag 14 november 2008 18:57 > To: 'Flash Coders List' > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3 > > Joel, > > Another good optimization point, Joel. If we assume that Karim's custom > cursor is already a child of the stage, then setChildIndex() should be > more > efficient. So I guess it depends on the implementation. > > Interestingly, > > I get a RangeError with this: > > stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren); > > but this works: > > stage.setChildIndex(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1); > > However, > > stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren); > > does not trigger the RangeError, and > > stage.addChildAt(customCursor, stage.numChildren - 1); > > still produces the desired result. > > If this is a bug then 'stage.numChildren - 1' would be the safe way to go. > > Regards, > > -Keith > http://keithreinfeld.home.comcast.net > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Stransky > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:25 AM > > To: Flash Coders List > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ComboBox + Custom Cursor , AS3 > > > > Very nice Keith. Wouldn't setChildIndex() work as well? Or is > addChildAt() > > better for ensuring that the cursor is added to the display list? > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Keith Reinfeld > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.3/1788 - Release Date: 14-11-2008 > 13:36 > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders