Quick two part question. One: why doesn't ActionScript 3 allow private classes? Two: why is writing "public class" a best practice if "private class" does not exist?
I could not find an explination in the books I am studying so I thought I'd ask here. TIA. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On May 19, 2013, at 6:01 AM, mike g wrote: > Just wondering, has Colin Moock put forward any thoughts re. > Flash/Actionscript's future direction? > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Paul A. <p...@ipauland.com> wrote: > >> On 19/05/2013 09:18, Hans Wichman wrote: >> >>> Karl, >>> >>> no harm intended, but do yourself and us a favor and get something like >>> Essential Actionscript 3 from Moock, it will save you lots and lots of >>> unnecessary self inflicted punishment :). >>> >>> >> Excellent advice. Don't try and get to grips with the language via the >> forum. >> >> This is a gentler introduction: >> >> http://shop.oreilly.com/**product/0636920010401.do<http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920010401.do> >> >> Also >> >> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/**actionscript/learning.html<http://www.adobe.com/devnet/actionscript/learning.html> >> >> Good luck >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.**com <Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders<http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> >> > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
