Hey Ben,
The Idea is that even if you are calling the same webservice you are
to create a new delegate.
The sequence is Event - Command - Delegate.
Not saying that i follow it, but I'm sure in it's strictest
implementation its 1 to 1.
Check this
http://jessewarden.com/2007/08/10-tips-for-working-with-cairngorm.html
6. There are 3 ways to use Commands & Delegates. I prefer A because
it’s consistent, leads to short class files, and is very explicit.
A) For every use case, you make 1 Command and 1 Event. This can
sometimes also mean 1 Delegate. (ie, LoginEvent, LoginCommand,
LoginDelegate)
Anyone from AC care to confirm?
On 23/10/2007, at 12:08 PM, ben.clinkinbeard wrote:
> the 1 to 1 event-command-delegate methodology
I've heard that mentioned indirectly a couple of times before but
don't remember ever reading it as a suggested methodology. Maybe I
just missed that instruction but I don't follow that practice. I have
one delegate per Web Service, so several Commands end up using the
same Delegate.
As a general practice, I think Commands are very often an appropriate
and efficient approach.
I haven't looked into PureMVC yet but would like to at some point.
That being said, I've also not really encountered any situations where
I felt Cairngorm was restricting me from accomplishing anything.
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Bjorn Schultheiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I don't know if there has been a previous thread on this. I'm
> assuming there is but i thought i'd start one again in light of some
> recent blog posts about a Silvafug meeting by the assertTrue guys on
> frameworks.
>
> http://www.asserttrue.com/articles/2007/10/17/silvafug-application-
> frameworks-presentation
> http://probertson.com/articles/2007/10/18/flex-application-
frameworks-
> presentations/
> http://www.sephiroth.it/weblog/archives/2007/10/flex_frameworks.php
>
> I haven't used PureMVC yet but I have used Cairngorm for a while
> (since the flash 7 days).
>
> I will say I've got a few beefs with Cairngorm and from just looking
> at the PureMVC diagram i already see a few solutions.
>
> I guess my main beefs with cairngorm has been the use of commands.
> Specifically in creating Re-usable commands.
> the 1 to 1 event-command-delegate methodology has never sat well
with
> me.
>
> Dumb Models (vo collections) is another.
>
> Support for unit testing in the View is another.
>
>
> Anyone care to help start a discussion?
>
>
> regards,
>
> Bjorn
>
