I'm not on-board with the 'willing to pay pretty well for expertise'
comment. as it is the norm to have a company pay the absolute least they can
for premium creative juices. Add in outsourcing, off-shore development,
whatnot. and you have a perfect recipe for under paying talented developers.
Also, just because the contracting company is charging you 150 stone per
hour doesn't mean the developer is seeing it either.

 

At any rate - to add a little to the code re-use dilemma. 

 

*. Prior art: if it is clear that the approach exists or has existed
publicly or in plain view before the contract was signed it would be very
difficult for a company to lay exclusive claim to any particular code block.
The big issue here has to deal with 'intellectual property' and how the code
comes into play with a protected, patentable, or other proprietary system.
if compromised - that is where the damage is calculated.

*. Substance and amount: re-using small bits here and there isn't a problem.
There are only a couple ways to write a 'for-loop' right? However, if the
substance is tied to a protected, patentable, or other proprietary system
you'll have a problem. Secondly, if the amount of the code that is re-used
is a 'best practice' it isn't going to be a problem (see: Prior Art) unless
it is of considerable size.

 

Rick Winscot

 

 

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Amy
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:56 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: OOP and Work for Hire

 

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe. If said tools and techniques are uncovered while being paid to 
accomplish this "floor re-finishing", then No they do not have any 
legal right to re-use it. In reality, will folks re-use/re-purpose what 
they've done? Absolutely but they have no legal right to it and by 
taking such actions they are placing themselves (albeit how greatly 
some people like to argue about) in peril of legal proceedings against 
them. How often would that happen? More often then people might 
realize. 

Then if that is the case experienced coders (and laborers) should make 
the same as new coders, since you wouldn't be able to ever grow and 
progress. Oddly, companies that have these sorts of agreements are 
usually very willing to pay pretty well for expertise ;-).

 

Reply via email to