Out of the last 100 threads on flexcomponents 22 were cross posted to
flexcoders. Almost every one (I think with one exception) was
cross-posted by the original author immediately to both lists
(sometimes as many as 5 lists! flexcoders, flex_india, flexcomponents,
ria-india). One of them was pretty much spam, and one of them was a
job post (which shouldn't have been posted to flexcoders or
flexcomponents, but only flexjobs).

If we look at flexcomponents as a microcosm, then we have: 22%
crossposting (1% legitimate cross-posting) and 2% spam.

Yeah, this isn't a scientific survey (although I do hope to get real
results comparing the full traffic of both lists soon). But I just
thought it was interesting.

Doug

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Anatole Tartakovsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
>>>How is >1 list simpler than 1 list ?<<
>
> The same way "threads by the topic" are simplier then unsorted individual
> email - you read only the ones you need and fold the rest. While you can
> argue that you can sort and fold messages with some client email
> customization, it is not a trivial task unless your server or client
> supports it.
>
> Basically weborb is 10 messages a day, apollo is 1 and flexcomponents are 2
> - I can manage that in my daily emails. Imagine that we separated the main
> list in subtopics and one of them would be "dashboards, charts and BI" -
> getting 5-10 messages a day - would you rather moderate that or whole
> list? Would it get up in your inbox? What are the chances that a single
> mail  would get missed by specialist? What about the quality of the answer?
> Visibility of all questions and answers on the topic? Am I the only one who
> thinks that libraries place books by category for convenience and access
> simplicity?
>
> There is nothing simple about fishing in 100+ items. Tom, as BI specialist
> you know firsthand that sorting data in the beginning eliminates order of
> magnitude processing later. Let us apply it to our daily life.
>
>>> But if there are too many they'll just post to them all. <<
>
> There are 2 types of crossposting people - the ones who did not receive the
> answer in the previous forum and the ones who cross post from the get go.
> The first type is OK - moderator or users can point them to a different
> forum. There are periods in flexcomponents that every second message gets
> "RTFM" or "go to flexcoders" responses. The second type needs some
> discipline. Here is what moderators and users do - saying this is not
> appropriate forum, remove the message to make life easier for the rest,
> giving warning bans for a day - however harsh it sounds, it works. The goal
> is to service the community - not to do somebodies homework. If the forums
> are speedy and high quality the crossposting ceases.
>
> I have seen heavily moderated product forums on compuserve (yes, before
> Internet) 15 years ago. You had less then one hour response (datetime
> US) time on 90+% of the questions. The volume was about 500 messages across
> 20 forums. "General" list was getting about 100 threads, the rest were much
> smaller, The answers would be actually correct ones. Vendors would have team
> of community moderators that would answer 50%+ of the questions in their
> domain - with multiple moderators per topic. There was very little
> repetition of the questions as people could search much better.
>
> Things come in cycles. Please consider this as "best practices" from the
> historical point.
>
> Now for the next cycle - can single list be better then multiple lists - the
> answer is yes, but not now
> The only way I can see single as an alternative to multiple list is to
> enforce tagging of the questions. That in turn means next generation of
> email clients or forcing everybody to use RSS type readers instead of email.
> We will get to it in a few years, its requires serious update to the email
> system. Next generations of email that are to be spam proof can make
> topics/tagging exchange a part of handshake protocol. Till then there is no
> enforceable way to sort the messages on the senders end.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Anatole Tartakovsky
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Tom Chiverton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 Jun 2008, Anatole Tartakovsky wrote:
>> > Multiple lists enforce thinking if it is appropriate before posting.
>>
>> Maybe. But if there are too many they'll just post to them all.
>>
>> > Moderators can ban/redirect unappropriate message. Flexcomponents often
>> > redirect new users to flexcoders if the question is not about
>> > components.
>> > You almost never see questions on UI design in weborb.
>>
>> See what I and Matt said - I think we're on the same page here.
>>
>> > All in all - let us have the simplest thing possible - multiple list - w
>>
>> How is >1 list simpler than 1 list ?
>>
>> --
>> Tom Chiverton
>>
>> ****************************************************
>>
>> This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
>>
>> Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
>> and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address
>> is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB.
>>  A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any
>> reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of
>> Halliwells LLP.  Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority.
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY
>>
>> This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and
>> may be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you
>> must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it
>> nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its
>> existence or contents.  If you have received this email in error please
>> delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500.
>>
>> For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> Flexcoders Mailing List
>> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
>> Search Archives:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
> 

Reply via email to