Ok, I see why I connected the two technologies.  Does the 'exact' timing needed 
for CCW help with the 'very narrow bandwidth detector' methodology?
Is the CCW detector only allowing or gating for the signal at an 'exact' moment 
in time?
hmmm, more questions. :-)




----- Original Message ----
From: Jim Lux
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 10:24:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio]  CCW


Quoting Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Sat 22 Dec 2007 07:23:58 PM PST:

>
>
>
> I always thought that the ability of GPS receivers to detect signals
  
>  that ride at or deep inside the noise levels was a direct  
> descendant  of the concepts of CCW.

Not exactly.  GPS relies on spreading the signal, and then despreading
  
it in in the receiver with an internally generated perfect copy of the
  
original spreading signal.  It's the phase of the spreading signal  
that gives you the unambiguous range measurement needed.

They are similar in that they both rely on using a very narrow  
bandwidth detector.


  The math experts on this list know more
> about this topic than I do.  But CCW was a pretty exciting concept   
> that could dramatically improve reception of signals that couldn't   
> be 'seen' or heard with the ear.
"was" is the operative term.  It was very effective using the  
technology available at the time.  Nowadays when it's straightforward  
getting ppb frequency references (GPS disciplined) and having a lot of
  
DSP available on the coding and decoding sides, the balance shifts...



I think that there are better comm methods for an HF channel.  The  
ionosphere puts a basic limit of a couple hertz on how narrow you can  
get (doppler spreading).  Furthermore, CW is an on/off modulation, so  
the average power is lower than a constant envelope method.   
Techniques such as PSK or MFSK are probably better, especially those  
that do some amount of Forward Error Correction and that have  
modulations "tuned" to the ionospheric channel.


>
>
> If the SDR can finally bring CCW into the ham 'bag of tricks' for   
> long distance RF communication than it will be terrific event.

I suspect that a low speed form of PSK16 or MFSK can blow it away.


OTOH, CCW has some historical interest, and the beauty of a software  
radio is that experimenting with it isn't particularly
 more difficult  
than any other modulation scheme.

Jim,W6RMK







      Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.





      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20071223/801dec33/attachment.html
 
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

Reply via email to