Cameron Moore wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Mayer) [2002.12.04 14:05]: > > Norman Vine wrote: > > > > > > Andy Ross writes: > > > >> > > > > I think you have to give serious thought to enabling this by default, > > > > > > Great idea, got a URL for a native WIN32 version of rsync ?? > > > > IMHO we should switch to HTTP. > > > > This avoids firewall problems and clients are also easy to get. > > Are you playing with FG at work? :-)
No. And chances are my firewall at home does work... But I don't know how the firewall at my univeristy is configured (and I'm allowed to use FGFS there...) Anyway, I can understand anybody who denies as much as possible in the firewall config (doesn't matter if it's at work or at home). And opening a port just for FGFS for a protocoll that can be replaced with a protocol that passes through most firewalls flawlessly doesn't seem like good practice. Oh, and changing to HTTP would allow proxies to cache the scenery... CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
