Curtis L. Olson writes: > For what it's worth, when I was looking into this, I found some > examples of runways with their ends literally at least 100' different > in elevation. Most aren't nearly that far off, but there are a > few.
For a 10,000 ft runway, that would require less than a 1% continuous grade, so it's not all that surprising. It will be a very good thing when we can take threshold elevations from FAA and DAFIF data. The SRTM/DEM data, however, is just too coarse -- that's why I'm suggesting flattening for now. All the best, David _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
