On Thursday 24 November 2005 20:18, Josh Babcock wrote: > Stefan Seifert wrote: > > Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > >> On Donnerstag 24 November 2005 04:44, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > >>> X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest > >>> Major opcode of failed request: 145 (GLX) > >>> Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate) > >>> Serial number of failed request: 30 > >>> Current serial number in output stream: 31 > >> > >> Well, as far as I can see and remember: > >> The client libraries send a request to the 'display system' and the > >> 'display system' bails out with an 'unsupported request'. > >> The error message is somehow misslieading, since the problem happens > >> when communicating with dri/drm instead of the X server - the reason I > >> called it 'display system' above. > > > > I just wanted to note, that when it is clear, that it's a bug in ATI's > > drivers, someone should post a bugreport in the ATI driver Bugzilla: > > http://ati.cchtml.com/ > > This is actually a place where driver developers are watching and a good > > chance that such bugs get fixed. Before posting, you should read the > > instructions at: http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33799828 > > which is btw. a thread in _the_ most useful forum for Linux using ATI > > card owners: http://www.rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88 > > > > Nine > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flightgear-devel mailing list > > Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org > > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > > I'm not sure if it's the same one, but I have been following this one: > http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232 > Doesn't seem to be any progress yet though. > > Josh
Ampere says that they are not the same bug. Paul _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
