"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> I simply don't see vehicle simulation as a possible venture.
[...]
> So, I would suggest focusing resources on improving the flight aspect of the
> simulator instead.
Certainly. Yet we might try to define what the term "vehicle
simulation" should mean in the given context. Actually I don't expect
that people would like to use FlightGear just for sitting in a driving
sim, driving a car along the given roads - they're already doing it
every day in real life :-)
What still might make sense is to place some simple AI objects into the
scene that automagically follow the given road/railroad tracks ....
but I'm uncertain if we need a dedicated FDM for that.
What _certainly_ could make sense one day is to have a manually driven
tow truck at airports - once we have a few more than just 20 persons
that participate in the MultiPlayer environment at the same time :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
