On Monday 08 October 2007 02:17, dave perry wrote:
> While optimizing the aitopilot config files for the Century IIB and III
> autopilots for the pa24 and the Altimatic IIIc for the SenecaII, a
> significant difference between the values of parameters (gains in
> particular) that give non oscillatory behavior in yasim and jsbsim
> became very apparent.  I had to completely turn off turbulence to get
> stability without significant overshoot in
> SenecaII/Systems/ALTIMATICIII.xml.  With the values submitted to cvs,
> the Seneca still has a wing rock in LOC REV and LOC modes with the
> default weather that has some turbulence.  The pa24 with the same values
> is as solid as a rock with the default turbulence all the way down the
> glide slope.  With the turbulence zero, both behave the same.
>
> The SenecaII wing rock with light turbulence appears to result from a
> very exaggerated adverse aileron yaw.  So I did the same experiment with
> the c172p and pa28-140 which both use the kap140.  With the default
> turbulence, the c172p oscillates so bad that you cannot complete the
> approach with the LOC needle going full stop to full stop near the
> runway.  The pa28-161 (also yasim) is as solid as a rock all the way
> down the glide slope with light to moderate turbulence.
>
> If you watch the oscillation for either jsbsim model, you should note
> that when the yoke is rotating counter clockwise, the nose is yawing
> right and then finally swings back left, as would be expected with
> extreme adverse aileron yaw.
>
>  Most high performance AC show very little AAY except in significant
> slow flight.  I would not expect that small aileron deflections should
> move the nose counter to the roll in a SenecaII or pa24.
>
> Two questions:
> 1.  Have others noticed this difference between jsbsim and yasim?
> 2.  Can this adverse aileron yaw be toned down in jsbsim?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Perry

Is auto-coordination enabled?  I don't think this is effective for YASim 
aircraft but it may be complicating things on JSBSim aircraft.  Also, are you 
getting the same frame-rates with both aircraft?  Last time I ran FG I found 
that the autopilot PID controllers ran at the frame rate and not at the <Ts> 
rate specified in the controller definitions, which could make them unstable 
outside a fairly narrow range of fps.

LeeE


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to