* Melchior FRANZ -- 11/2/2008 9:24 AM: > * Ralf Gerlich -- 11/1/2008 7:35 PM: > > I'd also like to add that a sample of the structure as proposed has been > > in the FlightGear data CVS for quite some time, containing data for the > > KSFO area, ready to be commented. IIRC this was also explicitly > > mentioned in the CVS logs. > > Huh? I don't see that in cvs: http://cvs.flightgear.org/viewvc/data/Airports/
Ah, I see: it's in the Scenery/ dir: http://cvs.flightgear.org/viewvc/data/Scenery/Airports/ Sorry, but that you didn't get comments on that was not an implicit agreement. Scenery commits are usually hundreds of changed files, and nobody assumes that changes are sneaked in there that everyone has to live with later, with no way to comment on them and change them. You should have proposed a major change *before* even committing it! Still: I object to that directory layout and the "twr" abbreviation (for "tower"! ... duh!). m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
