* Ralf Gerlich -- 11/2/2008 11:04 AM: > This was not a "take it or leave it" proposal, but rather I expected > technical arguments. You did not provide any, but instead asked for > cosmetical changes.
The difference between illogical, messy and inconsistent on the one side, and sane on the other is not "cosmetical". What about trying to go the right route, rather than the easy one? What are your technical arguments for the "proposed" directory layout? That you suggested it at a time where you aren't willing to modify it anymore? That's neither technical *nor* cosmetical. That's just introducing bad design out of laziness. :-P m. PS: I know that these scenery improvements are a lot of work, and it must be pretty frustrating to get mostly critical reactions, while the big achievements usually go unnoticed. That's life. But it's also a good sign: Everyone takes it as normal that you three scenery guys are doing great work, and that there are only smaller things left to criticize. That doesn't mean that those are unimportant "cosmetics", though. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel