* Ralf Gerlich -- 11/2/2008 11:04 AM:
> This was not a "take it or leave it" proposal, but rather I expected
> technical arguments. You did not provide any, but instead asked for
> cosmetical changes.
The difference between illogical, messy and inconsistent on the one
side, and sane on the other is not "cosmetical". What about trying
to go the right route, rather than the easy one? What are your
technical arguments for the "proposed" directory layout? That you
suggested it at a time where you aren't willing to modify it anymore?
That's neither technical *nor* cosmetical. That's just introducing
bad design out of laziness. :-P
m.
PS: I know that these scenery improvements are a lot of work, and
it must be pretty frustrating to get mostly critical reactions,
while the big achievements usually go unnoticed. That's life.
But it's also a good sign: Everyone takes it as normal that
you three scenery guys are doing great work, and that there
are only smaller things left to criticize. That doesn't mean
that those are unimportant "cosmetics", though. ;-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
