On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:28:53 +0000, James wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 30 Nov 2008, at 19:08, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > > As can be seen, there is a huge variation, and some pretty huge > > planes. I would suggest: > > - Dropping Concorde It is very nice, but also very advanced for > > new users. > > Sadly agreed - like the SR-71, it's prominent enough in screenshots > that people will know about it regardless, but it's not the most > forgiving of flying experiences. ..are we trying to be forgiving or realistic? Crashing the SR-71 because it's hard to fly, is a feature (of it), not a bug. ;o) > > - Adding the bo105. This means we have a helicopter, and the > > aircraft is only 3MB in size. ..amen. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
