> That would be one way to do it. I'm trying to come up with a better
> solution. The problem is that then there may be properties that are
> referenced which are not defined and you'd get unexpected behavior.
> 
> Jon

Another possible solution would be to create a C310x configuration that is
not synched with FlightGear, the same way that the C172x is for JSBSim
testing purposes only.

Jon



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to