> That would be one way to do it. I'm trying to come up with a better > solution. The problem is that then there may be properties that are > referenced which are not defined and you'd get unexpected behavior. > > Jon
Another possible solution would be to create a C310x configuration that is not synched with FlightGear, the same way that the C172x is for JSBSim testing purposes only. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel