On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Tim Moore <timoor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:18 PM, John Denker <j...@av8n.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/06/2010 07:54 AM, Csaba Halász wrote: >> >> > On 64 bit systems /lib64 should really be a symlink to /lib (similarly >> > for /usr/lib64) as that is the native architecture. >> > I say copy the stuff from lib64 to lib and create the symlink. >> >> That is one way of doing it. >> > No, see my previous message.
On native 64 bits systems there is no point in having a separate /lib and /lib64 - I certainly don't see any. Debian does provide the symlinks as I said. > The autoconf scripts do need to be brought into the modern 64 bit world, > ideally in a way that still permits building 32 bit binaries on 64 bit > systems. However, "it" does seem to "work out of the box" for most people, > which is why the bug remains. Yes, I guess most people just build for their native system. If not, I expect they would install into separate prefixes anyway. A fix would be nice, but I suppose most other bugs on your JD's list are more important. -- Csaba/Jester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
