On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:01 AM, John Denker <j...@av8n.com> wrote:
> On 03/01/2010 03:56 PM, Tim Moore wrote:
>
> > getline looks fine.
>
> :-)
>
> > Instead of getting steamed about readline, why not
> > implement it in terms of getline?
>
> I did.
>
> If this is really a question, please clarify the question.
>
I'm looking at io/sg_file.cxx in the sport branch. I see the old
implementation of readline inside an
"execrable_readline" #ifdef. I don't see any other implementation of
readline.
Perhaps my question would go away if I fetched your sport flightgear repo
too; since I don't have a commit id for the patch where you presumably
changed "readline" to "getline", I haven't. But it seems to me that you
could easily implement the old "execrable" readline interface in terms of
your spiffy getline and save yourself the trouble of changing "readline"
calls to "getline."
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
