Chris Wilkinson wrote:

> Frankly this guy is a big part of the reason I have yet to commit my scenery 
> and 
> aircraft to the community. I do NOT want someone making money from my efforts 
> without either my consent or without some form of input to the community as a 
> condition of being allowed to profit from all your work.

I do understand your sentiments very well, but I don't agree with your
conclusion. If everyone would keep his work private, just to prevent
artifacts like FPS from building a 'distribution' of it, how far do you
think would FlightGear have developed over the past 10 years ?

FPS is a nuisance, indeed, but boycotting "The FlightGear Project" just
as a means to hurt FPS doesn't buy us anything, I'd say. If we really
aim at doing anything wrt. FPS, then we'd probably better care about
getting our desolate "PR department" into better shape ....

> Failing a positive outcome there I support a re-licensing of the software, to 
> prevent this kind of thing. Simple as that.

The GPL hasn't been _that_ unsuccessful, overall  ;-)

Cheers,
        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to