On 12 Nov 2010, at 13:17, Martin Spott wrote:

> FPS is a nuisance, indeed, but boycotting "The FlightGear Project" just
> as a means to hurt FPS doesn't buy us anything, I'd say. If we really
> aim at doing anything wrt. FPS, then we'd probably better care about
> getting our desolate "PR department" into better shape ....

Just to re-iterate - the best defence is a good offence. Stop worrying about 
FPS, and make FG better (by contributing), or promoting it better. It's 
essentially a marketing scam, not a competing product. (The current 
flightgear.org website doesn't do us many favours, here). If people are 
determined to throw money away because 'free' stuff isn't as good, I ain't 
gonna stop them - they're going to get scammed sooner or later.

>> Failing a positive outcome there I support a re-licensing of the software, 
>> to 
>> prevent this kind of thing. Simple as that.
> 
> The GPL hasn't been _that_ unsuccessful, overall  ;-)

+ 1

As I said on the forums - not a single person who has (ever?) contributed 
*code* is in favour of re-licensing the code. 

James


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture
Simplifying enterprise desktop deployment and management using
Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end
client virtualization framework. Read more!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to