"Hal V. Engel" wrote:
> In general I agree that just taking all of the aircraft on GIT and making
> them
> available for download without some kind of rating system is a bad idea.
Actually we don't, in contrast, we already _do_ have sort of a (simple)
rating schema. When you look at the Aircraft download page, then
you'll see quite a few having the respective "Status" attribute
assigned.
I wonder if introducing a more complex schema for use with the download
page is going to reach its goal if even the simple schema isn't being
applied consistently. And I heavily doubt wether a couple of figures
really serve the user better than easily comprehensible terms like
"pre-alpha" or "early-production".
I think you're talking about how to run while it yet has to be
determined how to walk.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL,
new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages,
OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
