Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 15:11 +0100, Gerard ROBIN a écrit : > Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 22:32 +1000, Shelton D'Cruz a écrit : > > As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, the only real > > contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - really how many Cessna's do > > we really need?? and the rest - well they are too incomplete to fly!! > > > > Quite disappointing in fact. > > You can forget about flying these: > > > > 737 Boeing 737 > > 747 Boeing 747-400 (YASim) > > 747-100 Boeing 747-100 (JSBSim) > > A320 > > > > The others are mostly incomplete - anyone else find this as well? > > > > And pity the Citation - which is possessed. > > > > > > Regards > > Shelton. > > Hi Shelton, > > Do you known the time spent by the authors to build the aircrafts, > Being a user from the old times i could discover the progress on each > a/c, i cannot give a specific good example without any risk to > disappoint the others. > If you are able to fly and to explain the characteristics of each one, > so you are able to make one from yourself. > In addition to:
don't forget => FG is not a game Every a/c could be flyable in a MSFS standard, The target is to be as close as possible to the reality. Each author try to find the REAL characteristics, data, it takes time. -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
