Le vendredi 04 novembre 2005 à 07:38 -0800, Andy Ross a écrit : > Shelton D'Cruz wrote: > > As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, > > the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - > > really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - > > well they are too incomplete to fly!! > > The B1900 is a Beechcraft, not a Cessna, and a twin engine commuter > turboprop. Even interpreting "cessna" as a single engine light > aircraft, the 1900 ain't. > > And I'm on record that the most fun, most instructive time I've > had with FlightGear is practicing STOL techniques with the > Harrier -- an aircraft with no 3D model nor cockpit. I guess I > wasn't flying then. Thanks for setting me straight. > > Help or go home, basically. If you want eye candy and polish > over fixability and variety, stay with MSFS. > > Andy > Hi Andy,
I never told you precisely, so i do. Your work about Harrier was useful for me, in a private use i have converted a high detailed msfs model harrier GR7 so i do use your fdm. This an exemple where every a/c work is useful and must be delivered officially (not stored in a CVS tree only). -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
