Shelton D'Cruz wrote: > As I make my way down the list of so called "Flyable" planes, > the only real contender is the B1900D - quite disheartening - > really how many Cessna's do we really need?? and the rest - > well they are too incomplete to fly!!
The B1900 is a Beechcraft, not a Cessna, and a twin engine commuter turboprop. Even interpreting "cessna" as a single engine light aircraft, the 1900 ain't. And I'm on record that the most fun, most instructive time I've had with FlightGear is practicing STOL techniques with the Harrier -- an aircraft with no 3D model nor cockpit. I guess I wasn't flying then. Thanks for setting me straight. Help or go home, basically. If you want eye candy and polish over fixability and variety, stay with MSFS. Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
