Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 10:34 -0600, bass pumped a écrit : > On 11/27/05, Gerard ROBIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 07:54 -0800, Paul Duncan a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > It seems we could do with a little spreadsheet like we > > > used to have which gives frames/second for a given > > > hardware/OS combination. If you guys on the list could > > > E-mail me the following info, I'll make a nice little > > > spreadsheet and stick it up on the web - hopefully > > > either on or with a link from the main FG site. > > > > > > > > Your idea is good, > > Unfortunately we have others parameters, which are difficult to > > measure, > > what are the consequences, from AI (AC tanker, Carrier Nimitz, and > > others) from Atlas (which geometry), which A snip > > In that case it might be necessary to define a 'standard test' > condition' after which results of those can be sent. You could define > what fg should start with, what should be done, and that everything in > the background except essentials should be shut down. > I don't know enough to give any idea about Windows, Linux makes that very difficult, we cannot, i cannot reconfigure my several desktops ( i have 12), we cannot stop appli which are useful to manage and control local network, we cannot stop, system graphics utilities, daemons and so on We we do nothing To do that we must build a specific benchmark configuration. Cheers
-- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
