Hi Guys,
Thanks for the quick response.
> > > Your idea is good,
> > > Unfortunately we have others parameters, which
> are difficult to
> > > measure,
> > > what are the consequences, from AI (AC tanker,
> Carrier Nimitz, and
> > > others) from Atlas (which geometry), which A
> snip
> >
> > In that case it might be necessary to define a
> 'standard test'
> > condition' after which results of those can be
> sent. You could define
> > what fg should start with, what should be done,
> and that everything in
> > the background except essentials should be shut
> down.
> >
> I don't know enough to give any idea about
> Windows,
> Linux makes that very difficult, we cannot, i cannot
> reconfigure my
> several desktops ( i have 12),
> we cannot stop appli which are useful to manage and
> control local
> network, we cannot stop, system graphics
> utilities, daemons and so on
> We we do nothing
> To do that we must build a specific benchmark
> configuration.
> Cheers
Yeah, I think you're right. So, suppose we say start
off with Cessna 172 at KSFO *without* the Nimitz
scenario loaded.
Regarding the Linux/Windows issue, my plan was to use
frames/second as the key field, and then it any
operating system issue *might* become obvious... The
results will hopefully speak for themselves.
I can see this survey process is probably something
that will be refined over time, but it would be nice
to begin with a few data points :-)
Thanks!
Paul
~~~~~
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
