On 02/08/12 08:48, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: >> If not in test/ then maybe in examples/ ? >> Opinions?
I'd vote for 'test', since its probably a good opengl benchmark tool, considering it shows FPS. > Well, I guess the original code is in the public domain, so I imagine > that'd be OK, though my "additions" might need a little tidying up as > they might not be exhibiting the best fltk-way to do the things I > added... I'll take a stab at a cleanup. I /think/ I can take out all the glut stuff and make it use Fl::run(). _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list fltk@easysw.com http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk