On 02/08/12 08:48, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>> If not in test/ then maybe in examples/ ?
>> Opinions?

        I'd vote for 'test', since its probably a good opengl benchmark tool,
        considering it shows FPS.

> Well, I guess the original code is in the public domain, so I imagine
> that'd be OK, though my "additions" might need a little tidying up as
> they might not be exhibiting the best fltk-way to do the things I
> added...

        I'll take a stab at a cleanup.

        I /think/ I can take out all the glut stuff and make it use
        Fl::run().

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to