"Beatrix Willius" wrote: > If it's good enough for Wikipedia it should be good enough for us
Not for me. I hardly think that an anonymous encyclopedia is a valid source for what is actually a word. Invented words, poor spelling and generally bad writing are common online, and it's quite helpful to point out that "endianess" is not, has never been, and will never be a word. Just because people type consecutive letters does not make it a word. If one wanted to express the thought: "My flight was turbulent." that would not write: "My flyingness was turbulenty." :) -- Gary
