Hi,

It seems to me that if this project has even 1/10 of the impact that the 
earlier work had, then it will still be one of the most significant 
contributions to the state of the art.

-Robin Barooah

On Jan 21, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Peter Franta wrote:

> Agreed. It is sad, if only there was a way to get the Horse to drink once it 
> has been led to the water.
> 
> It would be great if this sort of stuff went main stream. Lets hope it leads 
> to implementations that the world can't ignore!
> 
> P
> 
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> wrote:
> On 21 January 2012 15:11, Peter Franta <pmfra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > VPRI answer to their Government and Private Funders, not those of us who
> > have the fortune to observe as they go.
> 
> Government-funded is publically funded. I'm disappointed that public
> funding rules apparently impose nothing more than an annual report on
> publically-funded research programs.
> 
> > It is my understanding the deliverable is not a "product" but "lessons
> > learned" to go and do it for real! Not ideal for us but then they're not
> > serving us.
> 
> If they're government-funded they're serving the US taxpayer.
> Admittedly I'm not a US citizen, but heck, I contribute to the
> revenues of plenty of US corporations, on which they presumably pay
> tax. And I said nothing about product, but I'll get to that later.
> 
> > Clearly this doesn't match your expectations. This is frustrating to you but
> > are your expectations their concern? Where do these expectations come from?
> 
> It matches my expectations all too well: brilliant research looking
> like it will be flushed down history's toilet like so much other
> brilliant research before it.
> 
> > Popular/Successful <> Better.
> 
> Exactly. If it were the same, it wouldn't be necessary to popularise
> better research in order to make it successful. Good stuff doesn't
> drive out bad by sheer superiority, sadly.
> 
> Simply doing good research is not enough. If it were we'd be decades
> ahead in computing, and centuries in other fields.
> 
> --
> http://rrt.sc3d.org
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> fonc@vpri.org
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> fonc@vpri.org
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to