| >2.What is the prefered way of adding zero ohm links to a single sided pcb?
| >i require them to be on the parts list (so can't duck to another layer and
| >just insert them later missing out top track layer)  if i add a link, the
| >drc thinks it is a broken net.  the only other way i thought of is adding
| >the link onto the schematic which is a pain as the pcb to schematic update
| >will not add components to the schematic automatically.  Am i missing
| >something?
| 
| No you are not missing something.
| 
| The basic answer is if it is not on the schematic then it is a solid 
| net.  DRC will think that the net is broken and report the error.  You may 
| be able to find some combination of rules that prevents the errors but this 
| will be much more clumsy than adding links to the schematic.  I seem to 
| recall this conversation having been had some time ago and the conclusion 
| was that putting the links onto the schematic is the most reliable method - 
| if you want them shown in the parts list.
| 
| Not much good news here I am afraid.
| 
| Ian Wilson


Here is a trick I use:

    I use 2 vias, large ones like 45mil/28mil, and a dummy signal layer, like 16.  
Even though I never will print layer 16, I place the jumpers on layer 16.  This tells 
the DRC that there is a connection so that open net errors will not appear.  This also 
helps you avoid making jumpers which may cross or short out.  When all is done, you 
can copy & paste the tracks on layer 16 to the top overlay layer, & voila, you have a 
jumper guide on your silk screen.

Hope this helps.
_____________
Brian Guralnick




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
*                      - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to