Wow,
you do have a problem Jason. Your issue sounded just like my past
experiences but I guess you are dealing with something different. From your
machine speed and the description of your processing times I am at a loss
because it would seem you have some problem that I have not heard discussed
on this list before. Good Luck.
Brad Velander,
Lead PCB Designer,
Norsat International Inc.,
#300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr.,
Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9.
Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct
Fax (604) 292-9010
website www.norsat.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:43 AM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Speed problem with Protel 99SE in PCB editor !
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is 99SE. 'Hide poly plane nets' and 'no online DRC' (all
> options off)
> does not
> solve the problem.
>
> Even editing a component footprint in pcb lib, then 'update footprint'
> causes the
> delays.
>
> E.g. I've just tried editing the footprint for a four pin
> mini-din, the
> shell is unconnected
> and all of the connected pins go via 6mm long tracks to smt fuses.
>
> The connector does not pierce the planes, the nets that it
> uses are not
> connected to
> any plane.
>
> Still 6 minutes per pin delay. (7 pins=42 minutes, so I'm going home)
>
> I didn't mention before that the machine is a 1GHz P4 with 1G RAM.
>
> Being a software engineer as well as a hardware engineer I'd
> love to see the
> code that
> generated so many iterations, it must be seriously bad.
>
> Tomorrow I'm going to try moving all of the polygons (12 of them) onto
> another PCB, then
> doing the same.
>
> J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *