On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:37:37 +0200, Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:25:55PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: >> >> My only problem with the name is that it's to common a word - searching >> for info on fossil keeps turning up paleontological sites. > > Try searching for "fossil scm". It works for me. I think our goal here is to make a ballyhoo around fossil (the same way how git quickly became popular some time ago), so 'fossil' keyword will not lead to the paleontological sites at the first place. And important step on this is to make website more stylish. Compare all these: * http://git-scm.com/ * http://mercurial.selenic.com/ * http://bazaar.canonical.com/ and please don't say that http://www.fossil-scm.org/ looks modern enough. Design matters. -- @macacq _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
