I love the name fossil and the logo... please don't change it! On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Trou Macacq <mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:37:37 +0200, Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:25:55PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: >>> >>> My only problem with the name is that it's to common a word - searching >>> for info on fossil keeps turning up paleontological sites. >> >> Try searching for "fossil scm". It works for me. > > I think our goal here is to make a ballyhoo around fossil (the same way > how git quickly became popular some time ago), so 'fossil' keyword will > not lead to the paleontological sites at the first place. > > And important step on this is to make website more stylish. Compare all > these: > > * http://git-scm.com/ > * http://mercurial.selenic.com/ > * http://bazaar.canonical.com/ > > and please don't say that http://www.fossil-scm.org/ looks modern enough. > > Design matters. > > -- > @macacq > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
-- Refactor Engage. Succeed. Repeat. PO Box 802, Labrador, Q 4215, Australia tel: +61 (0)7 5668 3424 web: refactor.com.au _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
