On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski <l...@maxnet.org.pl> wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2011, at 21:18 , Eric wrote: >> >> 1) there's no pleasing everybody (we all have our different favourites) > > But most people agree that any of markdown/restructuredtext/dokuwiki/whatever > simple syntax is nicer than html-based markup.
Maybe a tiny number of extensions to Fossil's wiki syntax? Like for bold, italic and underline. I am not sure what the most common sysntax for any of those are. That said, the issue of having Fossil deliver "raw" wiki text has been discussed, as well. This would facilitate client side wiki rendering. Also, several weeks ago, I mentioned that raw delivery can be simulated by enclosing the entire wiki content with <nowiki>. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
