2011/7/20 Remigiusz Modrzejewski <l...@maxnet.org.pl>: > > On Jul 20, 2011, at 21:18 , Eric wrote: > >>> +1 >> >> Oh, for heaven's sake! We did this before: >> >> 1) there's no pleasing everybody (we all have our different favourites) > > But most people agree that any of markdown/restructuredtext/dokuwiki/whatever > simple syntax is nicer than html-based markup. > >> 2) if its not available as a single-file C API, it's probably not going in >> anyway (and insisting that it be a library is just as restrictive) > > > At some point of this discussion there was an author willing to contribute > his (her?) markdown-mangling C code. But this author did not want to delve > into inner workings of Fossil, only offered code with good license and help > to whoever integrates that. But nobody volunteered to be the integrator.
This is wrong she volunteered to be the integrator she was just asking some help to work with in inner of fossil to be sure she does the things the right way, and the way richard would be happy with. Her code is closed to single C file to integrate, it out performs discout from my testing. Have a look. http://fossil.instinctive.eu/libupskirt/index And the more important it is really very easy to use. Anyway richard seems to have decided that there won't be any support for markdown in fossil. regards, Bapt _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
