On 3/11/15, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said David Mason on Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:17:57 -0400: > >> But I'm back. I could imagine one student doing some weird thing, but >> not a score of them with the same outcome. The directions were as I >> posted (without the bits in red). I would virtually guarantee that >> *none* of the students tried shun or rebuild or copied over the >> .fossil file.... but they all did it, and did the same thing? As >> likely that they all had the same hash code! :-) > > We're just eliminating all the obvious things. So, let me ask this... in > the PNG of the timeline you sent, why does your ``default setup'' commit > show up *after* the other timeline's first commit? > > According to your own steps, this should have happened prior to any > students getting it, yet the second timeline clearly has a beginning > time that precedes your ``default setup.'' > > Thanks, > > Andy > -- > TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055009a46 > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
-- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
