On 2017-11-22 22:43, Thomas wrote:
That was also my understanding in the beginning but it turned out I was
(terribly) wrong. You got to synchronise them manually, and then they're
not pulled automatically either.
I second this approach. Since Fossil already uses "unversioned" for the
current implementation, and I believe it might otherwise confuse users
used to the current process, I'd suggest a different name for a more
natural "unversioned" behaviour.
Laymen would understand "unversioned" like normal files (or artifacts)
without history tracking. You just want to add them to the repository
without keeping less recent versions. Absolutely natural in my opinion.
The most recent version is uploaded and kept. Previous versions
disappear into nimbo.
How about calling this suggested new behaviour "historyless artifacts"?
Or "historyless content"?
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
