On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 08:40 -0500, Chris Leonard wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> >> > If you've got a fast CPU and reasonable but unusupported graphics >> > hardware then it's usable but not great. >> > >> > No idea what Gnome 3 is like on a Raspberry Pi which would be the most >> > useful other guide as its got fairly snappy graphics but naff CPU and >> > relatively limited memory (512MB now) >> >> I suggest keeping an eye on the OLPC hardware as a low-end hardware >> benchmark for the GNOME desktop. As for "market share" there are over >> 2 million XO-1 and XO-1.5 out there and AFAICT the ARM based XO-1.75 >> is shipping and the touchscreen enabled XO-4 (in may ways similar to >> the XO-1.75) is on the way soon (FWIW ,I like the prototype I test >> on). >> >> OLPC builds are dual boot in Sugar and GNOME and I would love for >> GNOME to consider these users in their decision making. > > Have you shipped GNOME 3 on any of those, and, if so, were you using > GNOME fallback or GNOME shell? >
You can see the packages used for x86 and ARM builds respectively, for the most recent development build from OLPC http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/xo-1/31011o0.packages.txt http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/xo-4/31011o4.packages.txt These are basically Fedora 17 (or 18) spins. I can't really answer the fallback or shell question as I do not fully understand the details. cjl _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list