On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 00:49, Paul Ishenin <webpi...@mail.ru> wrote: > 03.10.2011 21:32, Alexander Klenin wrote: >> >> I'd say there is a continuum between those extremes, and (unfortunately) >> from my point of vew, FPC review is sometimes rather close to the former. >> I have been burned by this myself. > > When?
To avoid re-starting old flame, I'll send you an example privately. > I also don't see the big need for hosting the majority of FPC packages in > the FPC svn repository. Why not to leave there only the basic things like > windows, osx, gtk and other platform packages and to remove everything else > outside? There is also a balance there -- while I agree that currently FPC has some obvoiusly unneeded packages (a52/dts for example), there are some benefits for both users and developers when using a common repository. -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
