2014-05-16 11:13 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Boyarintsev <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com>:

> Just a suggestion. Try to rewrite the code not to use anonymous functions.
> The need for their support in FPC will go away.
> Seriously! no trolling here.
>

I agree.


>
> thanks,
> Dmitry
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Craig Peterson <cr...@scootersoftware.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> What's the current state of FPC's anonymous functions/closures support?
>>  Is anyone working on it? Is it something that a bounty would help with?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Craig Peterson
>> Scooter Software
>> _______________________________________________
>> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
>> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>



-- 
The best regards,

Fabio Luis Girardi
PascalSCADA Project
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pascalscada
http://www.pascalscada.com
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to