2014-05-16 11:13 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Boyarintsev <skalogryz.li...@gmail.com>:
> Just a suggestion. Try to rewrite the code not to use anonymous functions. > The need for their support in FPC will go away. > Seriously! no trolling here. > I agree. > > thanks, > Dmitry > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Craig Peterson <cr...@scootersoftware.com > > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> What's the current state of FPC's anonymous functions/closures support? >> Is anyone working on it? Is it something that a bounty would help with? >> >> Thanks, >> Craig Peterson >> Scooter Software >> _______________________________________________ >> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org >> http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal >> > > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > -- The best regards, Fabio Luis Girardi PascalSCADA Project http://sourceforge.net/projects/pascalscada http://www.pascalscada.com
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal