Hi,
2014-05-16 18:18 GMT+02:00 Florian Klämpfl <flor...@freepascal.org>: > > ... I mean, anonymous > methods are only a short cut; closures allow you to capture the state of > the variables of the outer > scope even if the outer scope is left. But that's it? I need anonymous methods too. They have no full-value replacement: 1. Full Generics.Collections compatibility (btw. I'am still working on the most cool ever Generics.* version ;) ) :P 2. More functional programming. 3. It will be possible to implement LINQ (! short way from anonymous methods to lambda expressions, and then LINQ). 4. :D Not everyone is an old pascal "procedural" dinosaur :) anonymous methods = fresh air. Regards Maciej Izak (hnb)
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
