On Thu, 18 May 2017, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-18 15:58, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
A real game would be done differently and then FPC is fast.
Oh, so work around the FPC problem. I get it now. ;-)
Wanne do PacMan in 160x100 resolution, no problem for FPC.
Check.
Wanne do something more modern...
Use Java instead. ;-) Check. Oh wait, that's what I did for that project.
ps:
I might have a few days free soon (between jobs), then I might dig
more into this problem. Seeing that everybody is so keen to know.
I am, because I do care about speed.
Giving people advice that they should use perl instead of FPC for math is
simply insulting.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
