In some email I received from Steve Ames, sie wrote: > > *shudder* I really, really dislike the idea of -RELEASE actually being a > wide beta so that some code can get a workout. LAbel it beta and more people > will use it than currently do anyway. Any reason not to release and ship a > 4.0-beta? -CURRENT = development which scares people. Beta means most bugs > already ironed out and looking for test by larger audience. -RELEASE should > not be a beta, ever. What do you think 3.0-RELEASE was ? This seems to be how FreeBSD works now. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Robert Watson
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Dennis Glatting
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th torstenb
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Torsten Blum
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Warner Losh
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th scanner
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Matthew Dillon
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Steve Ames
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Mr. K.
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Mike Smith
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Wes Peters
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Christian Kuhtz
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Darren Reed
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Dave Cornejo
- Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan ... Jordan K. Hubbard